Legal Writing for Legal Reading!

Archive for the tag “harrison”

Porcupine Tree Posts Round Up

Porcupine Tree was, for a number of years, my favorite new progressive rock band and, as a result, I tried to go see them as much as I could when I was not seeing Yes.  I have posted about them a number of times in this blog and you can find those posts below:



Random Concert Ticket Photos

As my readers know, I am a very avid concert goer.  Granted, since I have had children, I have had less time and less money to dedicate to seeing shows, but I still try to get two or three in every year.

For fun, I have already posted some tickets before, which you can find here:

I have also been to a variety of shows that really do not fit into any categories and I have posted a sort of grab bag of tickets below for various and miscellaneous shows.



20160203_210622 20160203_210649







20160203_210813 20160203_210820



20160203_210848 20160203_210901

  • Asia (a program from this show can be found here and a review here)


Porcupine Tree Tickets Through the Years

I am a huge fan of and of progressive rock and, aside from seeing Yes (see here) and going to the North East Art Rock Festival (see here), the band that I have seen the most is Porcupine Tree.  I became aware of Porcupine Tree in the mid-90s, and enjoyed them, but my first time seeing them live was at NEARFest 2001 (see here) and was blown away by their artistry and power (they broke the ceiling lights!).  In addition to NEARFest 2001 and the shows below, I also saw them open for Yes (see here), which was a tremendous show and very exciting to me, even though the confluence of those two bands was a little dissonant (Yes being positive and happy whilst Porcupine Tree being depressing and aggressive).  Porcupine Tree presents an interesting combination of Pink Floyd, Tool, and Radiohead; music with a modern psychedelic feel and electronic flair played on heavy metal sounding guitars, led by a charismatic front man, Steven Wilson, who performs shoeless and completely enveloped in the art he is trying to create on stage.  So, after many years of seeing them, I thought it would be fun to post my old tickets from those shows.  They are posted below.  Enjoy!


20160203_205202 20160203_205208 20160203_205225 20160203_205231 20160203_205256 20160203_205308 20160203_205317 20160203_205326

Program From October 7, 2006 Porcupine Tree Concert

This post is part of my series of posts on progressive rock which you can see here.

On October 7, 2006 I saw the progressive rock band Porcupine Tree during their tour in support of the Deadwing album at the Keswick Theater in Glenside, PAProjeKCt Six (the Robert Fripp (on electric guitar) and Adrian Belew (on electronic drums) King Crimson duo) opened the show.

The Keswick Theater often produces and distributes an event program at its shows, whether that show is a rock concert, ballet, or comedian or what-have-you, and the October 7, 2006 Porcupine Tree concert was no different.  I have taken photographs of that program and posted them below as fans may enjoy and be interested in what the band authorized for its show.



20160203_205450 20160203_205508 20160203_205524 20160203_205540

Program from 9/12/14 King Crimson Concert

This post is part of my series of posts on progressive rock which you can see here.

On September 12, 2014 I saw the progressive rock band King Crimson during their 2014 tour at the Kimmel Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania which featured a huge seven piece band with three drummers, two guitarists, a bass player, and a woodwind player.  I reviewed this concert, and that review, along with some pictures of the show, can be seen here.  It was easily one of the greatest concerts I have ever seen.

The Kimmel Center often produces and distributes an event program at its shows, and the September 12, 2014 King Crimson concert was no different.  I have taken photographs of that program and posted them below as fans may enjoy and be interested in what the band authorized for its show.



20160203_210914 20160203_210933

Movie Review: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

I recently saw the movie Star Wars: The Force Awakens (“TFA”) and these are my thoughts about it (this review contains some spoilers).  It should be noted that I am a big fan of the Star Wars franchise and comic books, and have been so since I was very young.  Indeed, I was introduced to the franchise when I saw Return of the Jedi at the movie theater when I was six years old in 1983I am sure that fandom biases my review in some way.

This movie is the first in the franchise not to have its creator, George Lucas, at the helm; instead, J. J. Abrams has now taken over.  Abrams is a consummate fanboy and many fans love him for it and, therefore, assume everything he touches is gold.  So, when he took over the Star Wars franchise, fans the world over thought he would right the Star Wars ship that had, allegedly, gone off course with the Prequel Trilogy.  I think TFA reveals both the great positives of Abrams’ approach, but also its enormous detriments.

For the record, I am a big fan of the Prequel Trilogy (admittedly this is an unpopular position to take).  Yes, the acting was bad, baby Vader and Jar Jar Binks were super annoying, and the CGI was overwhelming. In saying that, I think people forget that the Original Trilogy did not have great acting, had its share of annoying characters and, well, okay, no CGI, you have me there.  The problem is that people loved the Original Trilogy so much, they overlook its obvious problems and flaws, and expected anything else coming after it to basically duplicate it.  The Prequels offered an entirely new and creative take on the Star Wars universe.  It did not center on a fun and likable small band of people who were clearly good with a very clear bad guy to fight, but, instead, focused on an entire galaxy of people where, ultimately, everyone fights for the bad guy (and the bad guy wins!).  Instead of a clear good guy / bad guy conflict through a series of well-crafted action sequences, like in the Original Trilogy, the Prequel Trilogy offered fairly complex (for this sort of film) political issues and emotional and personal traumas and developments from childhood to adulthood, which even addressed such big philosophical topics like politics, parenthood, death, life, and love. So, needless to say, the Prequels did not offer what the audience expected, and the response, therefore, was predictably negative, and, where they gave the Originals a pass on some negatives, they hammered hard on those same negatives in the Prequels.  In my opinion, if the Originals are the “gold standard” of good ideas which are well executed, the Prequels are good ideas which could have been executed a little better.

This leads me to the TFA, which is the first film of the Sequel Trilogy.  Taken in order, the Prequel Trilogy is the story of how the child Anakin Skywalker develops into a Jedi as an adult and turns to evil as Darth Vader.  The Original Trilogy is the story of the redemption and death of Darth Vader and, in his place, the rise of his son Luke Skywalker.  TFA features Darth Vader’s grandson Ben Solo / Kylo Ren as a Dark Jedi (or perhaps Sith Lord, the movie is unclear) and Luke as the wizened old Jedi (and a mysterious woman called Rey who exhibits Force sensitivity and an attraction to the Skywalker lightsaber. I assume she will be revealed as Luke’s daughter in the next movie, though this is only a guess.).  Of course, as a backdrop, the Prequels feature the fall of the Galactic Republic and the rise of the Galactic Empire, the Originals feature the Rebellion’s succeeding in toppling the Empire, and TFA finds, out of the Empire, a New Republic has been formed which is opposed by the First Order that faces a Resistance that is tacitly supported by the New Republic (the relationship of these three is very unclear in the film).

Where the Prequels attempted to offer an entirely new and fresh take on Star Wars, Abrams elected to go the incredibly safe route and offer exactly what he thought the fans wanted to see, offering very little that is new, innovative, or interesting.  As a result, my thoughts and feelings about this movie are extremely schizophrenic.  On one hand I absolutely loved this movie and I cannot wait to own it and watch it a dozen times because it truly summons all the feelings of the Original Trilogy.  On the other hand, as a discerning fan, this movie offered me nothing more than that.  To put it another way, it is almost as if Abrams got a bingo board of everything a fan would want to see in a Star Wars movie and made sure he got them all into it, except he forgot originality and really anything new.  This movie is the greatest piece of fan service I have ever seen in my life.

It’s not that Abrams was deferential or reverential to the franchise.  If that is all it was, I would have no complaints.  Indeed, that sort of thing is something I truly appreciate.  No, instead he basically duplicated another film in the franchise almost plot point by plot point.  As an illustration of Abrams’ total lack of imagination in this film, consider the following: what movie am I describing?

A small droid on a desert planet contains secret vital information.  This droid comes into the possession of a lonely desert dweller who suddenly becomes embroiled in a intergalactic conflict.  The lead female character is befriended by swashbuckling guy in a leather jacket with his own agenda, and they develop an awkward romance with quirky flirtatious comments.  They all find themselves on the Millennium Falcon (which consistently malfunctions) while escaping from some bad guys who are led by a guy in a black mask and computerized voice and a British guy in basically a Nazi uniform.  After a visit to a bar of ill-repute, they discover that the bad guys have a planet-sized ultimate weapon, and it must be destroyed to save the day.  Plans are developed at a secret meeting of pilots (the meeting is led by a prominent woman), and a hologram of the weapon is revealed.   A part of those plans require an old guy to stealthily enter and sabotage the weapon from the inside in order to ensure its shields are shut down to allow for an assault by X-Wing fighters.  After sabotaging the weapon, the old guy seeks out and confronts, and is then killed by, the man in the black mask.  The sabotage allows an X-Wing to fly into a small hole in the weapon’s surface in order to destroy a small section of it, which serves to destroy all of it.  The good guys are successful, and, while that is happening, the lonely desert dweller discovers force sensitivity.

See?  The problem with this movie is that we have all seen it before when it was called A New Hope.  It is nearly the exact same movie.  Sure, some pieces are shifted around a little differently, genders or races may be changed, and locales may look different, but when it comes down to it, it is the same, and that is what makes this movie so frustrating.  I loved being transported back to the Star Wars I knew and loved.  The problem is that that Star Wars already exists, and I was hoping for TFA to provide a new adventure to take me to new places.  So, if I do not think about it much, I love TFA, but when I think a little harder, I get disappointed.  Where the Prequels were good ideas poorly executed, this movie was very well executed recycled ideas.  Whether TFA survives the test of time will be determined by what happens in parts VIII and IX.  If those movies basically follow the plot and flow of the Original Trilogy, then these movies will be a waste of time.  If TFA is a way to mildly “right the ship” before taking off into new directions, the complete lack of originality in TFA could be forgiven.

As an aside, the special effects in TFA are the best of any of the films.  Abrams’ use of practical effects, as opposed to constant CGI, was a welcome change, and makes this movie more immersive and realistic than any before it.

Finally, I have to get a little controversial and comment on the casting. Every actor was good and, in fact, this movie probably has the best acting of the franchise (though Carrie Fisher was never that good of an actress), and it was great to see Harrison Ford back in the saddle (though his acting was a bit on the caricature side honestly, which is to say it was often like Han Solo playing Han Solo if that makes sense).  Anthony Daniels looks like he put on weight, but who noticed that?  If Rey is the daughter of Luke (and I think she is), then the casting of Daisy Ridley (as Rey) is brilliant because I think Rey clearly looks like she could be related to her grandmother (Natalie Portman‘s Padme Amidala), her aunt (Carrie Fisher’s Princess Leia Organa), and her grandmother’s body double (Keira Knightley in The Phantom Menace).

My only issue with the casting was that it was so incredibly and blatantly pandering.  When I first learned that a new set of Star Wars movies was in the works, I told anyone who would listen that the featured Jedi would be a woman and the leading man would be black, and my prediction sadly came true.  Now, I have no problem with female or black characters at all.  What I have a problem with is pandering.  If Abrams wrote a story that happened to include a female Jedi or a black leading man, so be it, I would have no objection.  It is the fact that his decision to do so was so obvious, so telegraphed, and so predictable from so many years out from the premier of the movie, that it simply reveals that it lacked any sort of basis in storytelling or objective casting decisions, but, instead, smacks of pandering and some sort of “politically correct” agenda.  If there is one thing that pervades this movie, it is pandering: just like his decision to basically make TFA duplicate another movie, his casting decisions, too, lack any sort of actual creativity and are completely predicable.  The fan-service-bingo-like formula of the film panders to the fans, and the casting decisions panders to politically correct expectations.  He even doubled down on politically correct casting by also being sure to shoehorn the current Hollywood darling, and African actress, Lupita Nyong’o (as Maz Kanata) into the film for no apparent reason as well (Maz Kanata is, at best, a side character).  In fact, he notably (to me) never addresses Leia as “Princess” anywhere in the film, but only as “General” (as, of course, princesses are considered a negative thing for girls among the politically correct crowd).  How disappointing that, even with the casting of the film, Abrams was completely predicable, pandering, and without creativity.

Now, in saying all that, Abrams actually does cast really good actors, so his pandering is thankfully mitigated by great performances by Daisy Ridley (Rey) and John Boyega (Finn) and, quite honestly, by mid-way into the film my annoyance at seeing my prediction of cast pandering fulfilled became tempered, and by the end I totally forgot about it as Ridley and Boyega totally transcend the pandering that led to their casting, and they offered great performances and became fantastic new characters in their own right.  My complaint about pandering will, as a result, not translate into the next films (that is, unless, Abrams continues to do it).

So, to conclude, this movie is a fan’s dream in that it truly captures the Star Wars feelings, but it offers no reason for it to exist as it, basically, duplicates a prior film.  As stated above, how history will ultimately view this film depends on its sequels.

9/12/14 King Crimson Concert Review

This post is part of my series of posts on progressive rock which you can see here.

On Friday September 12, 2014 my friend Steve and I went to see King Crimson, that great pillar of progressive rock, live at the Kimmel Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  I have seen King Crimson or variations of it a few times over the years.  Specifically, I saw King Crimson live in 2003 at the Tower Theater in support of their then new album The Power to Believe.  That concert was amazing, albeit ear piercingly loud, but, as has been Crimson’s practice for many years, the set list consisted of only very recent material (relative to the date of the show) and group improvisation (I would note that, as it relied only on very recent material, the show was disappointingly short too as it was not even 90 minutes in duration).  Other than that, I have seen a Crimson subset (e.g.: a “FraKCtal”), ProjeKCt Six, and Robert Fripp as a solo performer, each open for Porcupine Tree at different times.  Of course, relatedly, I have seen Tony Levin live a few times in other contexts, namely with Liquid Tension Experiment, California Guitar Trio, and his own band.

Although I am an enormous King Crimson fan (they are in my top three with Yes at number one and (old) Genesis vying with Crimson for number two), I have not made a point to see them a lot mainly because, as I stated above, their practice has been to generally ignore older material in favor of the album or two immediately prior to the concert being played.  As much as I like new Crimson material, it is the old stuff that broke ground, made legions of devoted followers, and made me a fan, and it is that material I want to see and hear live.

When I heard that King Crimson was to go on the road with three drummers/percussionists, I thought that was interesting but not enough to go see them live as they have had two drummers/percussionists many times before (e.g.: 1972/’73, 1994/’95/’96, and 2007-present) and a third drummer did not seem to tip me in favor of paying the price of admission, especially if they would just play newer stuff.  Then I heard that venerable woodwind player Mel Collins would be rejoining the band.  Collins played with the band on their second, third, and fourth albums (1970 – 71), the classic Red, as well as their most recent offering A Scarcity of Miracles.  Now, the addition of Collins is interesting because, by and large, King Crimson has left the material of the early 1970s behind and I hoped that his presence in the band would inspire Fripp to mine King Crimson’s very rich back catalog.  Indeed, aside from a couple of tracks on Red, King Crimson has not had a woodwind player since 1971!  So, needless to say, adding one again in 2014 sent a clear message to me as to what the band’s intentions were for this tour.  Subsequent internet rumors confirmed that Crimson would be playing a generous swath of old material on this tour that has basically gone unplayed for four decades, so that sealed it for me: between the three drummers, Collins, and the material to be played, I now had to go see this show!  Indeed, I am happy to say that at this show, King Crimson played material from all eras of their history except the 1980’s and their lone album of the 1990’s (Thrak), which is fine by me as that material is my least favorite anyway (save for their latest album).  To make this happen, Crimson also featured players from all throughout their history and a new guy (Bill Rieflin) to boot!  As of this writing I am thirty-seven years old and I never thought I would ever hear some of this material played live by King Crimson and for that I will always be thankful I had the opportunity to see this show!

The venue was absolutely beautiful.  It usually is the theater for the Philadelphia Orchestra but I guess they also allow other artists to use it as well.  It is large with interesting curved walls, is made almost entirely of nice wood, and has a large pipe organ in the back wall.  A great setting for a great band.

As you will see below, after some basic information I will give an overview of the show, make comments on some individual pieces, and post some photographs of the show.

The band fielded the following line-up for this show:

Set List (the albums from which the songs are drawn are in parenthesis):

The only word I can think of for this show is “face-melting.”  This was one of the best concerts I have ever seen, bar none.  It was amazingly tight, intense, and relentless.  I thought the three drummers might create a noisy cacophony that would overtake the rest of the band, but thankfully that turned out not to be the case.  There were times when the drums became a little strong, but they never crossed the line and were generally tasteful and well arranged.  They did, however, take an already intense band to a level they had not yet achieved before.  There was clearly a pecking order among the drummers.  As one may expect, they tried a lot of different variations, but, generally speaking, Harrison was the “lead” drummer with Mastelotto supporting him and Rieflin providing a lot of color.  Rieflin also doubled as a keyboard player, especially for the older stuff.  I think the very expanded line up and multi-instrumentalists allowed the band to really flesh out their sound and capture many of the overdubs found on the albums.  Collins’ role was interesting.  Obviously he played the role he carved for himself on the pieces he played on originally.  When it came to the other material on which there was not originally a woodwind instrument in the music, Collins would often play in place of David Crossviolin or viola (King Crimson featured a violin and viola in its middle-1970’s period) or harmonize with the guitars or improvise a solo or melody over the rhythm created by the band (e.g.: during “Red” he would play a saxophone over some of it).  Although Fripp seems like an imposing and inflexible figure, I have to say that he is surprisingly (to me) an extremely unselfish lead guitar player.  He very often allowed Jakszyk to play his own lead parts (or shared them with him) or solos and, when Collins did not, Fripp would duplicate some of Cross’ violin/viola parts on his guitar.  I have to say that one of the best parts about seeing a concert, especially of a talented band playing challenging music, is seeing how the band can “pull it off,” and this show, with its three drummers and woodwind player to boot, was no exception!  The only thing missing from this show that has always been a feature of a King Crimson concert was improvisation.  There was no group improvisation, as has been so typical of Crimson for decades and even many of the solos did not vary much from the albums at times.

As usual, Fripp entered the stage from the opposite side from rest of the band.  Once he got situated on his stool and behind his wall of electronics, the show began in earnest.  They all wore some variation on a three piece suit.  The stage presentation was interesting: all the drummers lined up front while the other four stood on risers behind the drummers.  There was virtually no stage presence or visual show at all.  The stage was brightly lit and equally lit on all parts of it.  There were no spotlights or changing light colors or any sort of visual element to the lights at all.  It was lit just as the orchestra would be lit, for the utilitarian purpose of allowing the band to see one another and allowing the audience to see them.  Also, the band did not appear to have any amplifiers of their own on stage.  They used the venue’s public address system to play their music.  I am not sure if the lights and sound set ups as described above were due to the venue’s rules or the band’s choice, but neither adversely affected the music.  Consistent with having very little stage presence, all players stood in their place (or sat in the case of Fripp) rather stoically and played their music, and rarely engaged personally with the audience.  Indeed, as common for him, Fripp sat facing the band instead of the audience. Their lack of audience engagement even extended to them not having any inter-song banter.  They just began their show, played one song after another, and finished.  In fact, as my friend Steve noticed, they never (at least not as we noticed) even counted off the tempo to begin a piece of music.  Each piece began as if the band were of one mind.

The sound mix was challenging with the three drummers pounding away.  I can say that only on a couple of occasions did the sound get a little muddy which, unfortunately, almost always caused Collins’ saxophone to get lost in the mix.  In saying that, I have been to enough concerts to know that a good mix for my section of the theater is not necessarily good for another, and vice versa, so one cannot be too critical of the mix.  I do have to say that Levin’s playing very often got buried by the two guitars and the woodwinds.  Granted, he is the bass player and is supposed to lay down the bottom, but I would have liked to hear him a little better throughout the show.  Luckily, the band was tasteful in that the seven players did not all insist on playing something at all times if the music did not warrant it.  Interestingly, I have been to many many many concerts and this is one of the only shows I can think of where no one in the band ever gestured to one another or to a sound man off stage to adjust his volume levels.  I am not exaggerating when I say that they all entered the stage, played their songs one after another without fanfare, and then concluded.  The only light moments were, on occasion, between some of the songs where they would play goofy and spliced clips of interviews with the band and a sometimes inarticulate interviewer.

Some of the songs had some interesting highlights which I note below:

  • Larks’ Tongues in Aspic Part 1

As much as I looked forward to this show, I was a little skeptical as to how they would pull it off, and opening with this piece is a bold statement.  After the drummers played the tuned percussion opening and Fripp’s guitar played Cross’ violin part to introduce the piece, all of my concerns washed away when Jakszyk played the opening guitar line (which was originally played by Fripp on the album) in literally (to my ears) the exactly same tone and sound as the album.  I knew then this was the real deal and this was going to be a fantastic show.  This piece was as it should be: complex percussion, loud and crunchy riffs, and a foreboding quiet sections (where Collins’ flute replaced Cross’ violin).

  • Pictures of a City

I was surprised to have heard this piece as it has not been played since 1970!  This is the first song off their second album and when this was played I knew the band was going to be going deep into the back catalog!  Unfortunately, Collins’ saxophone was little buried in the mix at times.  Jakszyk’s voice was not quite as clear, pure and choir boy like as Greg Lake‘s voice (who originally sung on this song and is my favorite singer) but it got the job done.

  • The ConstruKction of Light

Collins played a saxophone over some of the more complex guitar lines which was an interesting addition.  On the album, this track segues seamlessly into a second part of this song (tracked separately) which includes vocals in order to conclude it.  At this concert, however, the band elected to conclude it differently by merely allowing the music to gradually slow into a gentle pastoral section led by flute, in a way very similar to how the Genesis song “Dancing with the Moonlit Knight” concludes.

  • One More Red Nightmare

This is one of my favorite Crimson songs.  Collins was really able to wail away during the instrumental sections.  Interestingly, between each main guitar riff, each drummer took his turn playing the drum breaks.  Jakszyk tried his voice on this John Wetton (the original singer of this song) tune, but, like his attempt to sing Lake’s material, his voice just is not quite right.  This time, Wetton’s voice is a little too soulful and harsh for Jakszyk to duplicate effectively.  As expected, this piece was loud and intense and aggressive.  Fantastic.

  • HooDoo (new for this show)

This was a mellow, quiet, and pastoral instrumental piece for electric upright bass and two flutes.  Jakszyk unexpectedly played the second flute.  This piece was composed for the tour.

  • Red

As expected, this piece was aggressive and meaty.  Levin played his electric upright bass during the quieter parts which effectively reproduced the bass cello played by Mark Charig on the original recording.  Moreover, at times Collins improvised a saxophone solo over the rhythmic parts to this piece.  The three sets of drums added an interesting dimension to this piece by making it somewhat march like.

  • Sailor’s Tale and The Letters

I was so surprised to see these tracks from the very obscure and mostly ignored album Islands.  What a delightful surprise!  The enlarged band line up was able to fully play all of the parts on the album and really flesh out the sound; the keyboards and Levin’s electric upright bass did well to capture the music as found on the album.  The cymbal work by the three drummers was very tastefully done; at one point they were playing light taps in sequence one after the other.  Jakszyk, now reproducing  Boz Burrell‘s voice, did a really good job presenting his vocal parts.  He really captured the tone and sound of Burrell’s voice.

  • Level Five

This is another song where Collins, having no role when the song was recorded, took the opportunity to play some improvised saxophone lines over some rhythmic parts.

  • Hell Bells

This was a drum trio piece written for this tour.

  • The Talking Drum

This is one of my favorite Crimson pieces, and the three drummers really took it to the next level.  I just wish Levin’s bass was not so buried in the mix on this.  Collins and Jakszyk added interesting dimensions as well, sometimes covering Cross’ parts and sometimes not.

  • Starless

What a classic King Crimson piece; some consider it the best ever.  I have seen this track played live once before by the band U.K. which features John Wetton who sung on this song originally with Crimson.  King Crimson played this song live before it was recorded for the Red album (as can be heard on The Great Deceiver) and the band used a violin in the piece and no woodwinds.  When it was eventually recorded on Red, Cross and his violin were out and Collins and his saxophone was in, as that is as it was in at this concert as well.  I am not sure which performance I liked better.  U.K. had Wetton’s soulful voice and authentic bass playing along with Eddie Jobson‘s amazing keyboard and violin playing.  At this show, Fripp played the mournful guitar lines as only he can play them, Rieflin played the keyboard lines, and Collins played the saxophone parts he recorded forty-years ago.  All I can say is that this piece of music is simply amazing and this concert was no exception.

  • Encore: Hell-Hounds of Krim

This was another drum trio piece written for this tour, this time very reminiscent of “B’Boom” from Thrak (which was originally a drum duo piece).  

  • Encore: Twenty-First Century Schizoid Man

The band closed with the very first song from their very first album which, as it happens, may be their most famous.  The blasting saxophones and searing guitar were vintage Crimson excitement.  Levin’s bass was buried again, but it did not really matter.  Although the band played it a little slower than the album, the fast runs and abrupt starts and stops were impressive nonetheless.

And now for some photographs!

Tony Levin takes photos from his perspective of the show and blogs about his concerts, and this one was no different.  You can find his blog entry on this show here.  In the photos from the stage that Levin took, you can see me five people to the right of the big guy in the red shirt on the third balcony; below is a photo from Levin’s page and you can barely see my head.

Finally, Steve and I took some photos at the show as well and they are posted below.  Steve took the first two and I took the rest and Levin’s photo is posted last.

IMG952014091295214450880 IMG_20140912_200038135

0912142200 0912142157a 0912142157 0912142141c 0912142141b 0912142141a 0912142141 0912142140a 0912142140 0912142042a 0912142042 0912141952a 0912141952







Post Navigation